STRANGER DANGER, WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

DID THE DEPUTY THAT ARRESTED ME ACT LIKE THE PEOPLE IN THIS VIDEO? I'M A GRANDFATHER ARRESTED TRYING TO FIND MY MISSING SEVEN YEAR OLD GRANDDAUGHTER.
I WAS TOLD SHE MIGHT BE AT A CONDO. I WENT TO A DOOR, IT WAS SLAMMED IN MT FACE, A VOICE INSIDE SAID OUTBACK. (THAT MATCHES WHAT THE STRANGER AT THE DOOR TOLD DEPUTY) WHEN I WENT OUTBACK TWO GUYS TRIED TO PUSH ME DOWN. DEPUTY ARRIVED, I TOLD HIM TO FIND MY GRANDDAUGHTER THAT SHE MIGHT BE IN A STRANGER'S APARTMENT, HE WENT OUTBACK AND QUESTIONED OTHERS. HE NEVER FOUND MY GRANDAUGHTER OR SPOKE WITH HER AND WHEN HE RETURNED HE TOLD ME GRANDPARENTS DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE GRANDCHILDREN IN WASHINGTON STATE, IT WAS ABOUT CUSTODY. I INSTINCTIVELY REACTED BY TELLING HIM TO GO EFFING FIND MY GRANDDAUGHTER, HE TESTIFIED THAT AFTER TEN SECONDS HE ARRESTED GRANFATHER FOR DISORDERLY CONDUCT. (TWO MONTHS LATER ADDING ASSAULT) THE DEPUTY HAD JUST TAKEN A STATEMENT FROM A STRANGER THAT TOLD THE DEPUTY THE CHILD WAS SLEEPING OVER IN THE STRANGER'S CONDO. THE WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY THOUGHT NOTHING OF THAT, NOT EVEN TRYING TO CORRECT THE STRANGER'S COMMENT IN CASE HE MISINTERPRETED WAS HE JUST HEARD. HE NEVER EVEN BOTHERED TO ASK THE STRANGER IF HE HAD THE PARENT'S PERMISSION. DEPUTY LEFT THE CHILD IN A WORSE CASE SCENARIO AND PARENTS DO NOT KNOW WHERE THEIR CHILD SLEPT. THREE MONTHS LATER THE STATE CHARGED ME WITH ASSAULT ON ONE OF THE GUYS WHO TRIED TO PUSH ME DOWN, CLAIMING I PUNCHED HIM AND GAVE HIM A BLOODY EAR. TWO OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE STRANGER TESTIFIED AGAINST ME IN THEIR RELATIVE'S BEHALF. IN COURT THEY ALL CHANGED THEIR STORIES. THE STRANGER SAID HE NEVER SAID THAT ABOUT SLEEPING OVER AND THE DEPUTY SAID THERE WAS ONLY TALK ABOUT SOMEONE SLEEPING OVER, COMPLETLY CONTRADICTING WHAT HE WROTE IN HIS POLICE REPORT. STORY GETS MORE UNBELIEVABLE! JUDGE DID NOT RECUSE HIMSELF AUTOMATICALLY SINCE HE WAS RELATED TO THE DEPUTY. THE ALLEGED ASSAULT VICTIM TURNS OUT TO BE AN INFAMOUS CANADIAN GOLD ROBBER YET DEFENSE WAS NEVER TOLD. TRIAL WAS MADE COMPLETELY UNWINNABLE BY THE JUDGE APPROVING TWO PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS THAT ALLOWED DEPUTY TO SIT THROUGHOUT ENTIRE TRIAL AND TESTIFY LAST. DEFENSE WARNED JUDGE THAT WE WERE AFRAID DEPUTY WOULD HERE WITNESS'S TESTIMONY AND CHANGE HIS TESTIMONY SINCE HIS POLICE REPORT CONTRADICTED WHAT THE WIRNESS TOLD INVESTIGATORS.