CULTURE OF DEATH ..... MURDER & TRAFFICKING CHILDREN COVERUPS ARE REAL!

 THIS GRANDFATHER WAS ARRESTED AFTER 10 SECONDS FOR TELLING A SHERIFF DEPUTY TO GO FIND HIS SEVEN YEAR GRANDDAUGHTER, AFTER REPEATED ATTEMPTS. DEFENDANT HAD JUST HAD A DOOR SLAMMED IN HIS FACE AT A CONDO WHERE HE WAS TOLD THE CHILD MIGHT BE AND THEN TWO MEN TRIED TO KNOCK HIM DOWN TO KEEP HIM FROM FINDING HIS GRANDDAUGHTER.
FAMILY FOUND OUT WEEKS LATER IN THE POLICE REPORT THAT DEPUTY HAD JUST TAKEN A REPORT FROM A STRANGER WHO SAID HE WAS PLANNING TO HAVE THE CHILD SLEEPOVER IN HIS CONDO. HAVING THIS INFORMATION IN HAND, THE OFFICER STILL ARRESTED THE DEFENDANT. THE DEPUTY APPARENTLY NEVER THOUGHT THERE WAS ANYTHING STRANGE ABOUT A CHILD SLEEPING IN A STRANGERS CONDO AND NEVER EVEN ATTEMPTED TO FURTHER QUESTION THE STRANGER TO POSSIBLY CLEAR UP ANY MISUNDERSTANDING OF HIS INTENTIONS. HOWEVER DEPUTY HAD WRITTEN IN HIS REPORT THAT HE WAS TOLD BY THE STRANGER THE DEFENDANT DID COME TO HIS DOOR AND HE TOLD DEFENDANT HE WOULD MEET HIM OUTBACK WHICH LOGISTICALLY PROVES HE WAS IN HIS CONDO WHICH COOBERATES DEFENDANT'S VERSION. THE DEPUTY NEVER TALKED WITH THE MISSING CHILD, MEANWHILE AFTER BEING MOVED ACROSS THE COURTYARD THE CHILD WAS TOLD TO STAY IN AN UPSTAIRS BEDROOM, DIRECTLY OVER THE HEAD OF THE DEPUTY WHO WAS TAKING A SECOND DIFFERENT VERSION OF A REPORT. THE DEPUTY COULD HAVE TALKED WITH THE CHILD OR EASILY HAVE WALKED OVER AND ASKED THE FATHER WHERE HIS CHILD WAS SLEEPING THAT NIGHT, WHICH WAS CERTAINLY NOT EXPECTED TO BE AT THE STARNGER'S. FAILING TO TELL THE CHILD'S FATHER, THE DEPUTY INSTEAD FOCUSED ON THE GRANDFATHER INSTEAD OF THE STRANGER, DEPUTY APPARENTLY DID NOT LIKE THE GRANDFATHER TELLING HIM ABRUPTLY TO GO FIND HIS GRANDDAUGHTER. AFTER THE ARREST THE FATHER UNKNOWINGLY LEFT HIS CHILD AT THE MOTHER IN LAW OF THE STRANGER, NEVER KNOWING OF THE STRANGERS PLAN. IF THE PARENTS KNEW BEFOREHAND THIS INFORMATION THEIR FAMILY WOULD NEVER HAVE LET THIS WOMAN TAKE THEIR CHILD THAT AFTERNOON TO ALLEGEDLY SLEEP IN HER CONDO WITH HER NINE YEAR OLD GRANDDAUGHTER. NEVER KNOWING THE REAL PLAN WAS TO HAVE THE CHILD SLEEPOVER IN THE STRANGER'S CONDO, THE FATHER UNKNOWINGLAY LEFT THE CHILD AT THE MOTHER-IN-LAWS AND LATER IN COURT THIS SAME WOMAN TESTIFIED THE CHILD DID NOT SLEEPOVER HER CONDO THAT NIGHT. BECAUSE THE WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY FAILED TO FIND THE CHILD OR SPEAK TO HER, AS THE GRANDFATHER TOLD HIM REPEATEDLY, NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE WHERE THE CHILD SLEPT THAT NIGHT AND THEREFORE LEFT THE CHILD IN A WORSE CASE SCENARIO. BACK IN 2007, WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT LEFT A CHILD KNOWINGLY IN CUSTODY OF A UNCLE WHO WAS RAPING THE CHILD AND POLICE TURNED THEIR BACKS CLAIMING THAT IT WASN'T A PARENT. SEE LEWIS V. WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.  

DEPUTY COULD HAVE SIMPLY WALKED OVER AND TOLD THE FATHER IMMEDIATELY WHAT THE STRANGER JUST TOLD HIM, GRANDFATHER WOULD NEVER HAVE GOTTEN ARRESTED. POLICE ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT CHILDREN, WE PRESUME THEY'RE MATURE AND EDUCATED TO RECOGNIZE CERTAIN RED FLAGS. WHAT MADE ME SICK WAS TO HEAR THE COURT MAKE A JOKE OUT OF IT WHEN THE PROSECUTOR ASKED THE DEPUTY "IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER WHERE SOMEONE SLEEPS OVER, DOES IT? DEPUTY ANSWERED "NO". THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT A SEVEN YEAR OLD GIRL AND WHERE THE PARENTS WERE LEFT NOT KNOWING WHERE THEIR CHILD SLEPT THAT NIGHT, THE DEPUTY LEFT THEIR CHILD IN A WORSE CASE SCENARIO, AND THEY ARE LAUGHING! DEPUTY EITHER DOESN'T SEE THE HARM WITH A MAN HAVING A SEVEN YEAR OLD SLEEPOVER HIS PLACE, PERHAPS IT DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE IF PARENTS AREN'T WARNED! THIS FAMILY WOULD NEVER HAVE FOUND OUT THIS WAS GOING ON BEHIND THEIR BACKS UNLESS GRANDFATHER WAS ARRESTED! THE MOTHER IN LAW OF THE STRANGER HAD PICKED THE CHILD UP AT THE CHILD'S HOUSE MANY TIMES WITH THE INTENTION OF THE CHILD TO SLEEP THE WOMAN'S CONDO WITH HER NINE YEAR OLD GRANDDAUGHTER YET INSTEAD A SON IN LAW APPEARS TO END UP WITH A CHILD SLEEPING OVER HIS HOUSE. EVEN IF SHE FELT SHE COULD TRUST HER SON IN LAW, IT'S STILL TERRIBLY WRONG FOR THIS MOTHER IN LAW TO BE SENDING THEIR CHILD ACROSS THE COURTYARD TO SLEEP IN A STRANGERS CONDO, NOT TO EVEN BOTHER ASKING THE PARENTS FOR PERMISSION, BUT THIS WOMAN DIDN'T EVEN CARE, SHE SIMPLY TESTIFIED IN COURT SHE NEVER PICKED THE CHILD UP THAT DAY, THAT TELLS A WHOLE LOT! JURY NEVER HEARD THE TRUTH, JUST SNIPS, JUDGE WAS RELATED TO THE SHERIFF DEPUTY AND MADE SURE DEFENSE COULD NEVER WIN BY GRANTING PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS THAT ALLOWED THE DEPUTY TO SIT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE TRIAL AND TESTIFY LAST, DESPITE DEFENSE CAVEAT THAT WITNESSES TESTIMONIES DIFFERED FROM WHAT WAS IN HIS POLICE REPORT AND DEFENSE WAS AFRAID HE'D CHANGE HIS STORY, WHICH HE DID. TO ADD TO THE EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE STATE KNOWINGLY ALLOWED THE DEPUTY TO DENY THE STRANGER EVER SAID OUR CHILD WAS SLEEPING OVER STRANGER'S CONDO AND THEN ALLOW THE STRANGER SAY HE NEVER SAID THAT TO DEPUTY, ALL PERJURED TESTIMONY WHICH THE COURT SHAOULD HAVE CALLED A MISTRIAL! I FIND OUT AFTER THE TRIAL THE WITNESS I ALLEGEDLY HIT TURNED OUT TO BE AN INFAMOUS CANDIAN CRIMINAL THAT STOLE MILLION IN TODAY'S DOLLARS IN GOLD FROM AIR CANADA. SUPREME COURT WILL HOPEFULLY BE HEARING DISCRECTIONARY REVIEW. BOTTOM LINE, DEPUTY SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY TOLD GRANDFATHER HE WOULD GO FIND HIS GRANDDAUGHTER AND TALK WITH HER TO MAKE SURE SHE WAS ALLRIGHT. AFTER TAKING THAT IMCRIMINATING STATEMENT FROM THE STRANGER DEPUTY SHOULD HAVE CALLED A DETECTIVE TO IMMEDIATELY QUESTION THE STRANGER. INSTEAD THE GRANDFATHER WAS ARRESTED, SPENT FIVE DAYS IN JAIL AND THE STRANGER WAS NEVER QUESTIONED, IN FACT, THE DEPUTY REPORTED THAT AFTER TALKING WITH THE STRANGER ALL THOUGHTS OF CHILD MOLESTATION WENT AWAY, WHY DIDN'T HIS EARLIER STATEMENT ABOUT SLEEPING OVER IN HIS CONDO, RAISE SOME RED FLAGS OF LURING DESCRIBED IN RCW 9A.40.090? WHY WAS HE GIVEN A FREE PASS TO GET OUT OF JAIL? THIS SAME CONDO COMPLEX IN BIRCH BAY IS WHERE A WOMAN TO SCARED TO TALK ABOUT IT IN PUBLIC, CALLED POLICE LATE ONE NIGHT TO REPORT SHE WAS WALKING HER DOG AND SAW MEN TAKING SOMETHING FROM A TRAILER, IT WAS TOLD TO ME IT LOOKED LIKE CHILDREN BEING LEAD IN CHAINS AND THROWN IN THE BACK OF ANOTHER TRUCK! THE STORY SURFACED LATER AND IT WAS CHANGED TO TAKING A RUG FROM THE TRAILER.

snip As to do with Nicole Kidman's father's death. child pedophile rings in the Netherlands, Europe, Canada and the US, the Australian pedophile network was said to include police officers, psychiatrists, biochemists, psychologists, actors, writers, politicians, university lecturers and medical doctors.