TALK GRANDPARENTS RIGHTS
Talk GrandParents Rights
ROMANS 13"no wrath upon good works"
Arrested for demanding deputy find his seven year old granddaughter!
WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT OCT 7, 2014
“Unjust government is not government, but tyranny" - Plato
"Better for him a millstone were hanged about his necke,
and cast into the sea, then should he offend one of these little ones.
"KING JAMES VERSION (1611)
Wednesday, September 5, 2018
Friday, July 13, 2018
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
Monday, November 27, 2017
WASHINGTON HUB FOR CHILD TRAFFICKING
This documentary "I Am Jane Doe" tells the stories of victims of American child sex trafficking including one in the Seattle, WA area. What happens to these children is shocking. And it's everywhere. Here's the short documentary;
Sunday, October 1, 2017
WASHINGTON STATE IS A HUB FOR CHILD TRAFFICKING, the new documentary "I Am Jane Doe" tells the stories of victims of American child sex trafficking including one in the Seattle, WA area. What happens to these children is shocking. And it's everywhere. Here's a short documentary;
Saturday, September 30, 2017
A COUNTY THAT PROTECTS LURING SUSPECTS IS VIOLATING THE LAW.
District court judge elich knew there was talk his relative, deputy reimer, left a child in a worse case scenario by failing to investigate a possible luring incident. In the trial video judge elich is heard telling defendant “he'd try to be fair, at least he thought he could” then immediately saying to deputy reimer, “I didn't know you were on this case”. Later inspection though, shows the deputy's name appearing numerous times in case paperwork prior to trial. (Item 1.) According to U.S. Supreme Court protocol, judges in this situation should automatically recuse themselves, it doesn't matter whether they're bias or prejucided or not, it's the simple perception by the public that has to be avoided. The single clause in the local statute that allowed the judge not to recuse himself, only requires him to put it on the record during the trial, which should be challenged for fairness. Fairness should have required notifying the unsuspecting defendant of his relation to the deputy well before trial. I felt pressured with everyone watching, having to leave the court room with everyone watching, it was an uncomfortable situation to say the least, having 5 minutes to decide in a crowded noisy corridor and fearing I will appear bias or prejudiced or worse yet, quilty by the jury if I chose a different judge, and finally wondering whether my court appointed lawyer is being truthful. The highest court says it tarnishs the reputation of all courts when a judge is critized for being biased or prejudiced, even if he wasn't. Judge Elich said "he could be fair, at least he thought he could", and my court appointed lawyer said it probably wouldn't make a difference anyway because I was confident the state couldn't get around the truth. I never thought they could call me drunk, use contradictory statements, change police reports and witness prior and impeach my son's testimony. It was only later on my own did I find out about Grenkow's criminal record and that defense lost our right to impeach and cross examine him on truthfulness that would have changed the outcome of the case. This information Only after being denied a lawyer that would represent me in the superior court on my Brady issue, an error requiring reversal by denying the required Anders review by the superior court that should have raised other claims besides Grenkow's criminal past. After agreeing to continue with Judge Elich, he immediately made the defense theory unwinable. Defense theory was completely defendable, prosecutor could not win although deputy sheriff's police report was different than what the deputy and the luring suspect Judge Elich was able to clear his relative and whatcom county and whatcom county sheriffs department of any responsibility for leaving a child in a worse case scenario. The child was left with one or more of the witnesses overnight because the deputy did not immediately tell the father what the stranger told the deputy and despite deputy taking his report and learning the child was going to be sleeping over in the stranger's apartment, deputy still went back and arrested the grandfather, telling him grandparents in Washington can’t see their grandchildren. Mr. Brown said if the deputy wouldn't get the child he would go find her himself and then was arrested for disorderly conduct. He had just experienced his seven year old granddaughter go missing and being told she was in a condo where the door was slammed in his face, then assaulted by two men, who was probably the ones who slammed the door. One was identified as Grenkow, the second was a seven foot tall person, who both tried to push the grandfather down. When the deputy arrived seconds later, I motioned to him to my front steps where I sat to tell him what was going on, I told him my granddaughter went missing and I was afraid for her because she looked scared and an older child said something creepy but when the deputy returned 15 minutes later without her, didn't learn till I saw police report that the deputy never told us what the stranger told him, that our granddaughter was sleeping over in the strangers condo. I couldn't believe when the deputy returned and told me that grandparents don't have a right to see their grandchildren in washington, it was about custody, I told him I couldn't believe he was telling me that, I swore at the deputy, he claimed 10 seconds, told him to go flipping find my granddaughter and talk with her or I would and was arrested for no reason. It must have been obvious to my court appointed attorney but not the defendant, that judge elich was not going to be fair for he made the defense theory completely useless by immediately allowing two state pretrial motions that allowed the deputy to sit throughout the entire trial and testify last despite the defense objection and previous caveat that he testify first because we were afraid he would change his story since witness testimonies differed from what was in his police report. The deputy was allowed to sit through trial and to change his story by saying there was only talk of Kayla sleeping over “somewhere” while allowing the stranger to change his story by saying “he never said the child was sleeping over his house”. Whether or not the stranger had done anything wrong or was planning on it is not supposed to be our job. What if what the stranger is true, that he never said the child was sleeping over his condo, doesn't this make the county liable to the stranger for falsely taking a police report suggesting he was luring a child into his house. The officer has set up a quandry for everyone, but falsely prosecuting the defendant is the only way for the state to hide from responsibity. The question from the defense should have asked in court, why wasn't the strangers and other witnesses contradictory statements investigated further and why wasn't the child deposed or a statement taken to see if there was anything else. The trial was a mockery to due process and fairness, disrepectful of especially the sixth and fourteenth amendments constitutional protections and to Brady and Anders despite miscontrued assumptions defense had full opportunities to question and cross examine witnesses that should be guaranteed by the sixth and fourteenth constitutional amendmenrs. There was no expectation ahead of time that the state would be allowed to state unequivalently that defendant was drunk, there was no proof, no alcohol charges and testimony by a infamous canadian criminal that's convictions for conspiracy and robbing air canada of millions of dollars in gold bullion. The police report never documented a bloody ear yet that and the upstanding reputation of the gold robber who has since become a dentist in canada, was the only reason the defendant was convicted, the prosecutor knew his witnessses testimonies were highly contradicting, so in his last words to the jury was that “who are you going to believe, Mr. Brown or Mr. Grenkow, who didn't even want to be here today”. This was the state's way to combat future accusations in any discovery whether grenkow was coerced to testify, which it sounds as though he was with his statements to the jury saying they should fine the defendant for what he is losing, which could be shown by the fact that witness grenkow moved shortly after the trial. It's imaginable he was coerced to testify to cement my conviction. Bottom line, as they say, they can indict a ham sandwich, but to do it with a luring suspect and his two relatives and a documented canadian criminal criminal makes this case outstanding. The last big lie by the prosecutor was discovered by the supreme courts clerks office when they reported that the state sent false information to both the court of appeals and the supreme court by stating that Grenkow, the Canadian goldrobber, who was Whatcom county’s star witness, never testified against me in my trial, that’s serious business for a prosecutors office to lie, they knew they had to make up all the lies because the sheriff was sued in Lewis v. Whatcom County six years earlier for leaving another little girl in a worse case scenario, as described by the Washington court of appeals, and had to pay that family eight million dollars, Whatcom County is guilty of false arrest and leaving my granddaughter in a worse case scenario, and lying to keep from getting slammed again by the Court of Appeals. Canada is famous for making joking slurs in Parliament on how uninformed and naive people react when it comes to politics. It’s kind of a joke when Parliamentarians have for years ridiculed each other by accusing opponents outloud in parliament of stealing tax payers monies by shouting outloud “don't be like the Grenkow Boys”, yet Whatcom County uses Grenkow to cover for a luring suspect so the County won’t get sued again for leaving a child with a luring suspect, so where would you rather live, where they made fun of crooks or used them to cover a crime. It wouldn't surprise me if someone picked up on how whatcom county treats families when strangers and criminals get together with the county to cover their wrongs by joking how the law south of the border favors criminals and punishes families for protecting children. Where are all the do gooders in Whatcom county that supposedly protect children. Grandfather was a over the road driver for the last seven years, driving between 12 to 15, 000 miles a month. Before that he worked for a chemical company for 20 years until be blew the whistle on chemical dumping. It was before the term whistlblower yet we lost my job and my home as a result of of age I cannot believe a law abiding citizen can get pulled into a situation where people were hiding a seven year old girl and not telling the parents the truth. After court date was set for two months, district court added an additional two and half months for Grenkow to get his personal business affairs in order. The original single charge of disorderly conduct was changed to breach of peace, which was argued in superior court and dropped in the interest of justice. Brown was arrested after ten seconds for telling the deputy to go and find his grannddaugter. The arrest should never have happened for the deputy already knew that a stranger had told the deputy the child was sleeping over his condo. This is where the mistake was made that led to a child being left in a worse case scenario. Apparently the deputy did not realize that he was implicating the stranger in a possible luring situation by writing the statement as he did. It was probably brought to the attention of the young officer that he made a serious mistake, for if it was later proven that the deputy did write it the way he heard it therefore the grandfather should not have been arrested. Notwithstanding, the damage was done, They probably realize the deputy could have asked to have an investigator to get involved. Either way any reasonable person would have questioned why a single man would be having a seven year old child sleep over his place with his three year old daughter. Even if he thought something was wrong with the situation he could have saved the stranger any grief by clearing up the question on the spot by asking him again if indeed he meant to say whether the child was or was not sleeping at his house. This failure at this point implies the deputy thought nothing wrong with the statement as he had wrote it, which tells a lot of the mindset of the deputy and should be a warning to parents thinking police are trained to protect and serve. As a friend of mind said in his campaign for sheriff, people want to be heard today, it is better for all if we deal more with our heart than our badge. The deputy could have asked if he had the parents permission or he could do what he did, nothing, afraid he might warn the stranger that he was surmising something was not right. There were ways he could have cleared the air of any suspicion, the deputy did neither. Instead he testified after speaking with the stranger he put any thoughts of molestation out of his head. It wasn't mentioned in court that the stranger told my granddaughter to go upstairs at klanders where they ran to with my granddaughter, in fact, the child was being kept directly over the head of the deputy yet he never asked to speak with my granddaughter or make sure she wasn't being held against her will. Instaed he came back to the grandfather who just had a door slammed in his face and two others, one of them grenkow, had tried to push him down after the stranger told him to meet him outback. The deputy was told a door was slammed in Browns face after he was told by a witness his missing granddaughter might be in the condo. The deputy spoke with several witnesses, including the stranger who slammed the door, and returned to Brown and told him grandparents don't have rights to see their grandchildren in washington, that t was all about custody. It was obvious the deputy was being told false information, the Brown family never had any custody issues, in fact, brown was a long haul truck driver and hadn't seen his grandchildren except for several stopovers for a few hours in the last seven years. Despite the deputy having just taken a statement from a stranger that the granddaughter was sleeping over in the stranger's condo, the deputy still arrested mr. brown. It is quite obvious the deputy made a huge mistake, any reasonable person, and any properly trained and right thinking person would have immediately questioned the stranger as to whether or not they had permission from the parents. The lack of properly investigating and following up on the stranger's statement and not warning the child's father ead to the child being left in a worse case scenario and no one knowing or admitting to where the child actually slept that night. This is the central cause for damages in this claim. which is the impetus for the assault charges. The resulting shame trial and trumped up false charges is a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the good judges that sit every day without bias and prejudice and not using the color of law to protect their relative. Assault charge aand drunk alleges and a coerced infamous canadian gold robber wirness Grenkow who testified falsely to a bloody ear. See ..Court of Appeals and Supreme Court pleadings (both courts were told by prosecutors office that Grenkow did not testify. Brown's discretinary reviews were denied on this false assumption that brown could not have been prejudiced by this false information given to both courts which decided brown could not have lost his one opportunity to cross examine grenkow for truthfulness and impeach his testimony. This was a vialation of brown's confrantation clause guranteed to him in the The sheriff deputy arrested the plaintiff with the knowledge that a stranger had just told the deputy that our seven year old granddaughter was sleeping over in the stranger's condo. That mistake caused ny granffaughter to be left in a worse case scenario and know one knows where the child slept that night. The prosecutor and the deputy made a snide comment to the jury that it makes no difference where someone sleeps or, does it officer. A court appointed attorney withdrew specifically on a Brady issue that was withheld by the prosecutors. without an attorney notwithstanding he made numerous attempts that were denied the crucial step of Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial and his grandaughter was left in a worse case scenario which created a danger creation situation and duty to protect by police was denied and parents civil rights were violated. An assigned attorney refused to defend his fa court system is it is obvious will be egregious if this court fails to assign an attorney to defend his right to , it will demonstrate a failure in the system. The 67 year old grandfather was arrested after “ten seconds” for telling a sheriff deputy repeatedly to go and find his seven year granddaughter. deputy talked with the stranger and never asking to talk with the child while she was being kept in a bedroom directly over the officer's head. The officer failed to investigate whether the child was being kept against her will.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Monday, March 21, 2016
Friday, February 12, 2016
Thursday, February 11, 2016
What a Real Sheriff Does!
WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF ELFO NEEDS TO DROP MY CHARGES, HE AND THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR KNOW THEIR DEPUTY MADE A MISTAKE AND LEFT MY GRANDDAUGHTER IN A WORSE CASE SCENARIO
Sheriff Elfo should admit his deputy made a mistake in arresting me, the prosecutor and judge should also. Whatcom County needs to investgate why the court went to so much trouble to prosecute me and all of them need to act like Deputy Palmer who states that people have the right to protect themselves, and their grandchildren, from becoming victims of criminal acts by others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)